|
70’s
- Liquidation under Companies Law as means of recovery.
- Liquidation proceedings carried out by High Courts – Apex Court in each State.
- Liquidation process fraught with delays.
80’s
- Entry norms for foreign capital are eased. Private Sector is offered greater role.
- Changing composition of labor from farm to industry raises need for protection.
- Large import of technology and capital goods exposes economy to cyclic stresses.
- Rising interest rate and weakening Rupee expected to erode repayment capability.
- Lending is recourse based. Capital, Industry and Labor require protection.
- Sick Industrial Companies law passed to set up a Board for Reconstruction (BIFR).
- Industrial enterprises and guarantors before BIFR eligible for protection from recovery measures.
- Reserve Bank lays down guidelines to be followed by banks for restructuring of debt.
- Government lays out policies to provide framework to deal with sick enterprises.
|
|
|
|
90’s
- Doubtful debt provisioning sets in. Balance Sheets of banks show fractures.
- Recovery efforts of banks against industrial enterprises faced with BIFR’s protection.
- Recovery of Debt law passed and Recovery Tribunals are set up.
- BIFR competent to permit to banks to initiate recovery measures against erring.
2000 onwards
- Banks permitted to lend against real estate. Land values start moving up. Change of land use offers opportunities in asset stripping, a new class of recovery.
- Lenders willing to trade in distress debt / control the process of liquidating assets.
- Securitization and Enforcement of Security Interest law passed.
- Reserve Bank permits banks to trade stressed assets and setting up of Asset Restructuring Companies. Parking On-the-fence eases.
- Manufacturing looks up and capital market improves.
- Significant recovery from industrial sickness.
- Deep restructuring plans carry recompense obligations on borrowers.
|
|
|
|
Banks and approved financial intermediaries (Asset Restructuring companies – ARC- and Non-banking Financial companies - NBFC) permitted to trade
Loan portfolio
|
|
Assignment of: Debt and security with recourses
Pledge of owner management stock
Tender based
|
|
|
|
Equity portfolio – Investment grade |
|
Right of first refusal of sitting management
Tender based |
|
|
|
Payment mechanism
|
|
Cash and / or Security receipts (expected to be tradable)
|
|
|
|
Legal recognition |
|
Nominal stamp duty is chargeable
Charge of acquirer over assets is recognized by Registrar
Acquirer steps in shoes of seller, including legal actions
|
|
|
|
Further trading / assignment
|
|
After lock-in of 18 months
|
- Owner managements often bring new debt holders to table, and restructure.
- Banks prefer to take co-operation of owner managements to avert delay / litigation.
- Fiscal benefits pending collection by Authorities are auctioned – NPV basis.
- Resolution Agents, a new class of intermediaries.
|
|
|
|
- Appropriation of cash flow realized from holding-on operations.
- All lenders may not provide funds for holding-on operations, asset maintenance.
- Recovery measures in case of consortium financing require super majority.
- Small value / 2nd / residuary charge holders become difficult to deal.
- Settlements with stakeholder/s outside the main settlement accelerate recovery.
- The acquirer has to be swift, and mobilize opinion with other lenders.
- Liabilities towards workmen and taxes can negate recovery efforts.
- Asset quality / quantity deteriorates if the person in possession is irresponsible.
- Deep payment plans linked to free cash flow continue to be exposed to same risks.
- Settlement for cash / stock / dispossessed collateral is the preferred way.
- Legal processes can delay actions / recovery.
- Process to change management does not yield if sitting management is hostile.
- Experience of rating agencies is limited.
|
|
|
|
BIFR, Sick Companies law
|
|
Rehabilitates industry, protects workmen / debt holders
|
|
|
|
Companies law, Voluntary Restructuring / Liquidation
|
|
Implements restructuring to achieve going concern status / asset sale to pay creditors |
|
|
|
Recovery Tribunals
|
|
Sell assets, enforce recovery, pay security holders |
|
|
|
Securitization law |
|
Enables security interest holders to sell assets, recover
|
- Debt instruments, having cross border implications, call piece by piece dealing.
- Emerging complexity of corporate structures demands wider set of skills.
- Internationalization of businesses will lead to a need for networked consultants.
- Company law Tribunal to consolidate possibilities before BIFR & Companies law.
- Legal decisions are defining the processes; rules of natural justice followed.
- More powers to banks / ARC to change management.
- Protection from recovery will not be available without lender consent.
- Plans for Holding-on operations will have to address needs of security holders.
- Short term interim managers to handle the restructuring process.
- Administration and Liquidation with the help of outside agencies.
|
|
|
|
-
Acquirers can be Banks, NBFC, ARC.
-
Banks ring fence by setting up ARC’s and moving out their stress assets.
-
Reserve Bank is the approving agency for NBFC and ARC.
-
Foreigners setting-up / investing in NBFC and ARC to meet capitalization norms.
-
Stress assets sold through tenders and at times as basket; rule of highest bid.
-
The investment and profits can be repatriated after meeting taxes.
Acquirers working outside the Regulatory can acquire:
- Off-shore instruments like, convertible bonds, etc. issued by Indian companies.
- Exposure in off-shore entities of Indian company.
Recent entry strategies have been:
- Off-shore fund with an AMC, investing from tax friendly jurisdiction in equity of sick companies, to retire debt default obligations of sick company.
- ARC to consolidate debt to achieve super majority (working with sitting / hostile management).
|
|
|